Valuation of Trees in Auckland

800px-PohutukawaCornwallis

Pōhutukawa at Cornwallis Beach. Photo credit: Ed323, Wikimedia Commons

In the course of reading a resource consent application for a tree removal recently, I came across the standard accepted method for assessing the value of trees in order to work out the cost of mitigation (i.e. what new trees or other plantings will be planted) in dollar terms. Having a professional interest in such things – I am a business broker as well as an elected member of Council – I am setting out the approach in this post.

Removal Costs are based on the current costs of tree removal incurred by Council including the physical removal of the tree and stump.

Amenity Costs

The following formula is used to assist with calculating the monetary amenity value of a tree.

Value (V) = Basic Value ($) x Species (S) x Aesthetics (A) x Locality (L) x Condition (C)

When young trees with less than a 6cm trunk diameter or less will be replaced by another tree, there will be no amenity value charge. The Auckland method is based on the method used by the City of Melbourne which was derived from the formula (by Dr. Peter Yau, 1990) of the Maurer-Hoffman Formula.

The basic monetary value of a tree is taken from the internationally accepted table of values devised by the American Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers and the International Society of Arboriculture, which in the base year 1988 was US$27 per square inch basal trunk area. When converted to a value corresponding to centimetres in trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) the Basic Monetary Value table has been updated to reflect more current monetary values.

Basic Value ($) is determined by matching the trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) with its corresponding base value:

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.00.01

Species Factor (S)

A tree is assessed according to its known natural life span and its rate of growth in a particular environment. For example, a long-lived tree will be scored higher than a short-lived tree. significant features of the tree will also modify how the tree is scored. Judgement regarding species factor must be made by a qualified arborist.

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.00.14Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.00.34

Aesthetics (A)

The aesthetic value of a tree is determined by the impact on the landscape if the were removed. This category is closely tied to the locality factor (L).

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.01.40

Locality (L)

The locality factor is determined by the tree’s geographical situation. Trees in a large city main street or boulevard score highest because of the stressful growing environment in which the tree has to survive. As the location becomes more rural, the significance of the tree diminishes.

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.01.48

Tree Condition (C)

The tree condition value is determined by the corresponding total score of the assessment criteria.

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.01.59

Total Score

Screen Shot 2018-07-05 at 19.02.31

Advertisements

About Vernon Tava

Business broker, elected member of Auckland Council. Focused on sustainability. Lives in Auckland, New Zealand.
This entry was posted in Urbanism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s